|Here we are again.|
There are the national genocides that are occurring as the governments schism, and the Battles of Armageddon progress between those who stands on the principles and those whose security and support are threatened. People lie when their support is threatened, so this is why there has been such an increase in the media of people who are caught in their lies, and genocides are based on weaving an illusion.
There are family genocides occurring as marriages based on romantic attachments break apart,
The solutions are all the same. To stop a genocide, someone must stand up and say "stop." Someone must defend the person who is being defamed. The overview genocide is the character defamation of Saddam Hussein by George W. Bush. As that is addressed by the United States of America, it demonstrates how to end the other genocides that are raging.
Christians have warned that there would be an end times for the planet. The ends times are known as Armageddon. That was supposed to be the time when Christians were saved and drawn into heaven, but the prophecy was for Christians, too, because being a Christian does not save anyone from the Battles of Armageddon. Christian marriages break apart, too, and if one party gets revenge on another, it turns into a genocide. Armageddon means "the silly things people do," and because the Universe functions in cycles, it comes at the end of the cycle, including the end of life crisis for one person.
Is Donald Trump right about building a stronger military to fight these battles? No. Why put more guns into the hands of people in crisis, and if there is a military response, who are the victims and who are the villains? During the Rwanda Genocide, the UN Peacekeeping troops stood by and counted the bodies. They had no orders to stop the killing.
The overview idea that ends the genocide is that every person on the planet must address the fact that the conflict in Iraq was a genocide, and that the solution is the plan for the international government. The Exit Strategy for Iraq sets the stage for disputes to be resolved in court rather than the battlefield, and the monies now wasted on war--and genocides--will go to the people instead.
If people are going down into the power game of genocide and weaving an illusion because their security and support was threatened, then it makes no sense to deprive them of the little they have left, and to think you can outsmart them by diverting the money into your own pockets. This is occurring on every level.
The solution is here now. The existing structure cannot end or prevent wars and genocides. Our organization is standing up to defend Saddam Hussein, and to offer the plan for the international government as the solution to this crisis. It is also the solution that ends the genocide that is occurring within our organization in an attempt to steal the plan for the international government, and within the families of the independent members of our organization.
Our plan for the international government must enable every person on the planet to be able to create the life they want--the life that enables them to fulfill their purpose in life. The international government, based on Universal Law, will guarantee their right to do that. Because the requirement to participate is based on the principles of the cooperation of nature, which involves everyone sharing his or her talents and gifts, which everyone is born with to enable us to fulfill our purpose in life, no one can be left out of the global renaissance, even the poorest and smallest and weakest person on the planet.
No one can be left out, because if they are left out, under Universal Law, the person who leaves the other out is left out himself and the person who is left out is brought back into the framework through projects that benefit everyone.
Change only occurs easily at the end or the beginning of a cycle, and so this is a time where they are many changes occurring. Mankind can go up, down or straight ahead. Which will it be? Will the United States defend Saddam Hussein by addressing the legality of the Iraq War, or will we devolve further into a global conflict?