Thursday, March 30, 2017

Conflicts of Interests and Ethics Violations

The Trump family is being watched closely by the government ethics people for potential conflicts of interests between their roles in the federal government and their business dealings. Donald Trump's election to the presidency as a businessman with no prior government experience brings up an a major issue that must be addressed, not out of a sense of judgment against him here, but because, under the plan for the international government, there will be many such potential conflicts of interests and ethics violations.

In the era of world peace, marriages will be based on lifepartnerships, where each will have a vocation and an avocation, and one's vocation is the other's avocation, and they will mentor each other. Lifepartnerships create a strong marriage bond, but it blurs the lines between nonprofits and businesses in existing IRS tax codes. The problem is that avocations are generally non-profit organizations that are meant to benefit everyone while vocations are family businesses meant to be their financial foundation, and the existing tax codes restrict nonprofits from personally benefiting anyone.

Our organization is experiencing a similar conflict of interest issue between our nonprofit organization and our publishing business. Karen Holmes is the director of the organization and the owner of the publishing business that will be responsible for printing all but the trade books for the organization's projects. This conflict of interest issue is being addressed as part of our first government proposal--An Exit Strategy for Iraq. Bringing in the professional publishing team solves the problem.

The team will be made up of six people who create a Flower of Life team, where much of the responsibility is delegated to them. Each has an existing business, so it makes a win-win agreement that allows everyone to function on a higher level. Holmes is a channel and is responsible for channeling books, and then she prints 200 amateur-quality copies of each book to sell to the independent members as the government proposals are opened to debate. Then she turns the manuscripts over to the professionals, and these are sold to the general public.

Income from the sales of the books is divided so that half the income goes to the nonprofit organization, 25% to reprints, and 25% to the authors. This is similar to how a farmer divides his or her crops--half is sold to benefit everyone, 25% is eaten by the farmer and his or her family, and 25% is kept to reseed the fields for the following year. All our businesses associated with the organization will function this way. The US government recognizes contributions to charitable organizations, and contributing 50% of our income to a nonprofit organization will allow us to decide where our tax dollars go.

Two people from the professional publishing team will also be part of the organization's twelve person financial board, and they will help to decide where the monies go in support of the organization's project. Holmes will have no real say in where the funds are distributed. Each independent member of our organization is the boss of our projects.

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Military intervention does not stop revenge and mayhem

Our organization is divided and conquered, and the "boogie pirates" are perpetrating acts of revenge and mayhem to prevent the plan for the international government from moving forward. People are being intimidated and backed into the corner, and many are facing their end of life crisis from cancer and other major diseases because they don't know how to resolve their crises. Mental illness is pandemic because people were offered a chance to get their life on a higher level, but the offer was meant to draw them into the conspiracy, and so they were trapped. There are death squads made up of either the masterminds of the mayhem, or young people who grew up in wealthy families, but when their family was torn apart, they had no way to defend themselves. Even competent adults with years of experience in law enforcement have been duped, and have became victims of the mayhem. Ripples of effects have gone out to drag in many, many people.

The games of genocide and slavery are based on weaving an illusion, and once the Grand Lie has been told, the truth does not overcome the lie. It just reaches the point where no one knows who to trust. People who plays these games do so to outsmart their victims by using covert and overt actions, and they drag more and more people into chaos.

What is occurring in Iraq and Syria and the DRCongo are also occurring in parts of California, and spilling over into Oregon and several other states. We can say for certain that the solution is not military intervention. The knee-jerk reaction that ends a war makes a genocide worse. To send in the troops, such as the National Guard or the UN Peacekeeping troops, only exacerbates the problem because it is impossible to know who actually is behind the crimes and the mayhem is perpetrated like a lightning strike that is over before you can react. You cannot defend yourself from prejudice and ulterior motives.

The first step to stop a genocide is for people to stand up and say "enough is enough." It makes no sense for someone to do these acts of mayhem that lead to chaos, and the more acts they perpetrate, the more ludicrous they become. These acts of mayhem are meant to prevent a plan from progressing and another person from excelling because the "boogie pirates" thought the person who offered the plan didn't have the capacity to fulfill the plan, and so they stole the plan but don't have the capacity to bring it about. It is a way to save face. The two power games that are associated with weaving an illusion in acts of revenge are genocide and slavery, and genocides are perpetrated by people who function outside of their capacity. For the victims, the idea is to not get trapped in their illusion that someone is able to prevent you from getting your life, but to keep moving forward on creating your project that benefits everyone.

Few people know how to create their life. Now there is a school that is coming about, called the Faith of the Pure Ray that teaches people how to create their life by studying the principles of each of the seven major religions.

In the Faith of the Pure Ray, this season we are looking at Judaism, and how Moses overcame the enslavement of his people. Slavery is usually part of an act of revenge, so the time of Moses, there would have been a character defamation campaign against someone of power. In Egypt, the pharaoh had absolute power, but Moses was able to demonstrate a greater capacity, but then it took the seven plagues to weaken the pharaoh's resolve, and the last plaque was the immediate backlash from Universal Law of Cause and Effect. The seven plagues relate to the Seven Deadly Sins, and included are wars and genocides, but also diseases such as strokes, pancreatic cancer and heart attacks, and financial collapse.

Now, any world leader that is playing power games of revenge will become like the Pharaoh, and when one individual stands up and demonstrates greater capacity, that modern day Moses will stand on the principles and the Pharaoh will go down into the games, and Battles of Armageddon will follow. It will unleash the seven plagues in that nation, and the last battle will lead to the Pharaoh coming to the understanding that you cannot get the life you want by playing power games of revenge, which goes against Universal Law.

While this is occurring, others who have already learned their lessons will be moving ahead and will start to create the proposed international government.

Everyone in our organization must come through the crisis center to become part of the organization, and therefore part of the plan for the international government.

Monday, March 20, 2017

The First Principle of Technology

In past posts, I talked about the purpose for Stonehenge, and today I would like to focus on an earlier era, and about more ancient technologies. Technology can be used as a tool or a weapon, and so there is a sense of duality between having a plan and dealing with conflict resolution.

The Atlanteans were very advanced technologically because they had acquired information from aliens. They used crystals as an energy source, and could travel all over the planet. They were a very power nation. The continent of Atlantis was located in the Atlantic ocean, and on the other side of the planet, in the Pacific Ocean, was located the continent of Lemuria. There is a continuum of frequency across the planet, and so Lemuria was very peaceful.

In Atlantis, there were the White Robes and the Black Robes, and there was a continuum of frequency between them. The Black Robes had the technology to control the planet, but the White Robes protested their abuse of power. When it became apparent that those who were the powerful elite had no intention of listening to the wise counsel of those with the wider perspective, one man brought together a select group of White Robes and Black Robes, and sent them to England with the instructions to hold onto the principles of conflict resolution.

The two continents fell into the ocean when the Atlanteans directed the energy of the huge crystal, like a laser, through the planet toward Lemuria, and they tore apart the planet. There were huge earthquakes and tsunamis for many centuries. Mankind got kicked back to cave-man times. The aliens had no interest in working with mankind again until we evolved to the point where we would not annihilate ourselves.

As Seth explains in "A Manual for Peace," there are 80 alien species on Earth. I have channeled a book with one of them, and in the set of books that are associated with the Exit Strategy for Iraq government proposal, Seth retro-engineers and alien space drive.

As mankind progressed from swords and spears to weapons that can once again tear apart the planet and the global communication system that enables one individual to become very powerful, we are replaying that time period. Just as last time, mankind has a choice. Will mankind tear apart the planet in an attempt to create a global empire and be kicked back to cave-man days or evolve to the higher level?

For the last 15,000 years, we have been in a state of duality, but now the focus shifts to what caused the duality in the first place. Where did our ancestors go wrong?

They used technology as a weapon rather than a tool. They did not listen to the wise advice of people who saw the wider perspective. They relied on power games of revenge rather than making win-win agreements--and conspiracy may seem to be a win-win agreement, but it is not. Even compromise is not a win-win agreement, it is a straight ahead choice that passes the conflict on to future generations. Mankind has not progressed that far after all.

A friend and I once talked about what life would be like if society collapsed, and he told me he would live off the land. Sounds nice to return to the simplicity of our ancestors, but how many people will fight over that salmon in the river, and winters can get very cold if you live in a cave, and how about the amount of knowledge and other resources that are lost when society is kicked back 30,000 years?

It is one step forward and two steps back when we do what is in no one's best interest.

Mankind can live in harmony with nature and not have to endure starvation. The perspective of the cooperation of nature is counter-intuitive also. Under the perspective that nature is dog-eat-dog leads to the ultimate conclusion that there will be one man left standing at the top of the mountain after annihilating the rest of humanity. That is in no one's best interest. Been there, done that--fifteen thousand years ago. If you are that man who has the power to be the last man standing, what was left of the society? How did that one man keep his lifestyle of ease and comfort when the rest of the planet was in a survival mode? How can one mortal man keep a power base when he must sleep? Who can he trust?

The first principle of technology is based on the qualitative perspective of mathematics. It is counter-intuitive from what seems to be the logical use of numbers. The quantitative perspective of  the number one is a single object, while the qualitative perspective is that One is made up of many parts.

We are looking at a One World government that is made up of many equal parts, and it has the capacity to return mankind to a sense of unification. That will allow us to take the next step in mankind's evolution--maybe even to the stars!


Saturday, March 18, 2017

The Rain in Spain

Guernica, Spain, after the bombing
Over the last month or so, I have had several events occur in my life and they all have had some connection to the Spanish Civil War. I am sure that if I delve into the history books I will find the similarities to what is occurring now in the world, and within this organization, with that horrific war in Spain.

The plan for the international government was introduced many years ago, and stolen, and those who stole it have now gathered an army of people who have been dragged into the conflict. The lies have gone out, and no one knows who to trust, and now there have been alliances made that draw in people of power in hopes their involvement will tip the results to favor a particular side. In Spain, Germany and Russia were brought into the conflict, and the proxy war devolved. By drawing in the people of power, the Spanish people took the dispute to the lower level, and it became more bloody.

Why are people fighting over the plan for world peace? Because it is a prize that is the opportunity of a lifetime for one average person to become the most important person on the planet? That misses the point entirely. Why try to climb the ladder of success,  to reach the top of the mountain, in a flat hierarchy? You can be the best you can be to create your niche, but why compete with others when the idea is to be unique, and to market your niche with others who need what you have, and have what you need?

I watched the movie "Guernica," about a journalist who finally is able to get the true story out to the world about what was occurring in the conflict, and he was stationed in that small town in Spain. The news agency in town was, to the point of the Battle of Guernica, only allowing propaganda to get out. It was all "fake news." It was "alternative facts." The news wove an illusion, and put a positive spin on it as if it would help win the war.

Now I feel like that journalist. I sit at my keyboard and try to tell people what is really occurring, I try to stop the fighting because I understand that the one thing that unites everyone is that we all just want to live our lives without interference, but the illusion is so powerful that my voice is drowned out by the cries of people in crisis. I am not fighting the battles, it is my responsibility to get the message out about the stupidity of wars.

The first two government proposals start by drawing in the people necessary to help people to rise out of the abyss. The ripples of effects of the global conflicts have gone out to drag every person on the planet in some way into the crisis. One proposal starts with bringing together the professional publishing team, and the other starts with bringing together the light-bearers--the channels and prophets--to create the crisis center. We are the Red Cross on the battlefields, but this conflict is a test that has challenged even the light-bearers, and they have been in crisis, too. Our first goal is to establish an international court system so disputes between nations are resolved in court rather than the battlefield.

The power games are reaching their ultimate conclusion. Mankind has had to learn that the games don't work. The only thing you can trust is Universal Law, and because the power games go against Universal Law, there is always a backlash to the games.

In "A Manual for Peace," Seth offers readers insights into what peace will be like, and he says we will know peace has come when the biggest news story is about the sale of peaches down at the store. Doesn't that sound lovely?

Sunday, March 12, 2017

Run Through or End Run?

Mankind always has three choices, up, down or straight ahead. Everyone wants to be able to get his or her life on a higher level, and to do that, at the Moment of Choice, we must stand on the principles. To choose to go down is to rely on the power games, like revenge, and then we face the backlashes. Straight ahead is to ignore the crisis and pass it on to future generations, and it takes seven generations to undo the damage that has been done.

The plan for the international government is on course, progressing through the existing structure. The idea is spreading out more every day, but to make it a reality, another individual has had to stand up and say stop to the character defamation campaign that is being waged against me by the potential independent members of the organization. That point kicks the plan from an idea with great potential into the planning stages. When that person chose to go straight ahead, he passed the responsibility onto future generations. The plan keeps moving forward past the people who were offered the opportunity, but they didn't see it when it came to them.

This is what occurred at Stonehenge. The last conflict resolution event that occurred there was not a war, but had devolved into a genocide because it was an act of revenge. The opportunity was there to end the conflict between the two original kings, but instead, one of the kings allied himself with a third king to win the war, and he and the man who took advantage of the conflict to further his own ambitions traveled to Stonehenge, and the third king vandalized Stonehenge when he realized that the children are the future of any nation, and to drag them into the conflict benefits no one. When the conflict reaches the point where children soldiers are part of the army, that society is facing seven generations of humanitarian crises.

Our plan must address the worst case scenario for the planet, including a global genocide. While the potential members of the organization are trapped in the illusion of three or more simultaneous genocides, the inventions are showing great potential to solve problems around the world. The Light Source Invention is a demonstration of how to solve major crises across the planet, including what the United Nations considers the worst humanitarian crisis since 1945. The plan for the international government is becoming less important as the crises devolve, and the Flower of Life level is becoming more important as it demonstrates its potential. In other words, if no one likes me as the head of the organization, then the head of the technology team can step up and demonstrate the principles of technology and draw in the next segment of the people. That is to be expected. Only two people on the planet see the potential for the plan to bring world peace.

With all the conflict, the first step is to address conflict resolution, and that is opposite to the technology segment. We have not yet been able to get started to create the plan for the international government. First we must address conflict resolution, and that is why there are two initial proposals. The Exit Strategy for Iraq is a U.S. economic stimulus plan, and the United States will not participate in the plan for the international government until squeezed to do so because we are affected economically.

Saddam Hussein stood on the principles at a Moment of Choice, and George W. Bush went down into the power games because that choice affected his security and support. The United States was grabbing for power but also Iraq's resources. That means that for the conflict to end, America must reach the understanding that by we cannot get control of resources by taking them from another country. We thought we were standing on the principles and Iraq on the power games.

No one will come into the plan until they see the potential of the plan to enable them to get their life on a higher level. To try to explain it to them before the plan has progressed to that point is like trying to attack an immovable object. The only way to do that is to do an end run around it and keep moving forward. You explain you are going to get the life you want, you do it, and then you draw people into the plan.

Stonehenge is evolving to the higher level as we address how it was vandalized millennia ago. Until that time, it ended wars, but didn't know how to stop a genocide.

Friday, March 10, 2017

Everyone Must See the Need to End the Conflict

Everyone wants to be seen in the best possible way, but doing silly things isn't the time you shine. This is Armageddon, and Armageddon is the point when people do silly things. Armageddon is the known as the end times. It is not the end of the world, although it seems like it is. It is the ultimate conclusion of the games people are playing, and what should have worked has stopped working, and you can't imagine why.

This morning I would like to show you just how silly people can be by telling you what is occurring within our organization. The same thing is occurring all over the planet.

The idea for the international government was first introduced at our prayer circle in 1999 when I channeled a book, called "A Manual for Peace," with one of our guides, Seth. He is famous for his books through Jane Roberts. Everyone thought it is a wonderful idea. We know it will lead to world peace, and we were happy to be part of it. At the prayer circle, the spiritual hierarchy enabled each of us to decide on a project idea, and my project is the plan for the international government, the overview idea, and all of the other's projects are the application of that. Our projects come from our heart. But, we are average people, lower income people who have never been able to get ahead in life, and the journey to create that dream seemed to be too long. No one knew the first step in making his or her plan a reality. 

The prayer circle broke apart, and people went different directions. Then for me came a long series of books and booklets, and ideas for more projects. The new information teaches how to Walk the Rainbow, which is the application of the planning process you apply in your life to create the life you want. The government proposals allow the entire planet to Walk the Rainbow. 

In the meantime, the idea for the international government continued to spread. The original members of the prayer circle each had their ideas, but fears and belief structures interfered. I had the books and the understanding on how to create a project, and was working to bring the plan for the international government about, and made remarkable progress, but I was homeless because of a family conflict and had absolutely no money at all, and had to work for many years out of the local library. The ideas were stolen by people who believed they had greater capacity. The others from the prayer circle migrated to the thieves rather than to Walk the Rainbow. Most got revenge on me for my lack of capacity because they saw in me what was inside of them.

The plan for the international government is based on the idea that everyone functions from within his or her own capacity. You cannot get your life by getting revenge on others, by blaming others. You must Walk the Rainbow, step by step through the planning process. This is not rocket science. This is logical. It is a long journey, taken one step at a time. As you Walk the Rainbow, you draw others behind you and a line forms. 

The plan is based on everyone sharing his or her talents and gifts, and the thieves are not able to demonstrate their capacity to do another's project. It is impossible to do another's project. This is where the thieves became silly. They had to be first in line. They had to be more capable than the rest of us. They had to be powerful. They didn't see the potential for everyone to be part of the idea, and to create what is in their hearts to create.  They didn't want to be equal. They didn't see that to steal a project that is based on one's talents and gifts makes no sense at all. The more logical and capable they tried to be, the sillier they looked. What seemed to be simple and logical became anything but that, and so they were backed into the proverbial corner, and by their choices, they came out of the corner over the top of others. Their revenge became violent.

Everyone reached the ultimate conclusion of their games by sacrificing the one person who has been working to enable every person on the planet to be able to create the life he or she wants. By doing so, they sacrificed their own projects. Now the thieves have major legal problems to overcome. That does not mean that they no longer have projects, but rather than being the head of the organization-- and the next Nobel Peace Prize winner-- their projects may be actually how to overcome being a violent sociopath. We don't tell people what to do, but how to do it. Projects come from the heart.

That is the end times. The opportunities end, and people are squeezed to let go of the power games. You either let go of the games or you die. People die when they believe they can't get their life, and you can't get your life by playing the games.

The first step in the longest journey--to create the life you want-- is how to overcome your crisis. There is a preliminary step, and that is to understand why getting revenge doesn't work.  

I am Walking the Rainbow and have made remarkable progress by doing so, but I have to bring people into the organization so they can do their projects, and before that can happen, everyone must see the need to end the conflict. 

Wednesday, March 8, 2017

Three Levels of Genocides

Here we are again. 
There are three levels to the Universe, and there are three levels to the genocides that are devolving now. There is the international genocide that was started when George W. Bush told the United Nations that Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapons and the intent to use them against us. The ripples of effects are still going out to draw in every person on the planet. Eventually everyone will be fighting for their life.

There are the national genocides that are occurring as the governments schism, and the Battles of Armageddon progress between those who stands on the principles and those whose security and support are threatened. People lie when their support is threatened, so this is why there has been such an increase in the media of people who are caught in their lies, and genocides are based on weaving an illusion.

There are family genocides occurring as marriages based on romantic attachments break apart,

The solutions are all the same. To stop a genocide, someone must stand up and say "stop." Someone must defend the person who is being defamed. The overview genocide is the character defamation of Saddam Hussein by George W. Bush. As that is addressed by the United States of America, it demonstrates how to end the other genocides that are raging.

Christians have warned that there would be an end times for the planet. The ends times are known as Armageddon. That was supposed to be the time when Christians were saved and drawn into heaven, but the prophecy was for Christians, too, because being a Christian does not save anyone from the Battles of Armageddon. Christian marriages break apart, too, and if one party gets revenge on another, it turns into a genocide. Armageddon means "the silly things people do," and because the Universe functions in cycles, it comes at the end of the cycle, including the end of life crisis for one person.

Is Donald Trump right about building a stronger military to fight these battles? No. Why put more guns into the hands of people in crisis, and if there is a military response, who are the victims and who are the villains? During the Rwanda Genocide, the UN Peacekeeping troops stood by and counted the bodies. They had no orders to stop the killing.

The overview idea that ends the genocide is that every person on the planet must address the fact that the conflict in Iraq was a genocide, and that the solution is the plan for the international government. The Exit Strategy for Iraq sets the stage for disputes to be resolved in court rather than the battlefield, and the monies now wasted on war--and genocides--will go to the people instead.

If people are going down into the power game of genocide and weaving an illusion because their security and support was threatened, then it makes no sense to deprive them of the little they have left, and to think you can outsmart them by diverting the money into your own pockets. This is occurring on every level.

The solution is here now. The existing structure cannot end or prevent wars and genocides. Our organization is standing up to defend Saddam Hussein, and to offer the plan for the international government as the solution to this crisis. It is also the solution that ends the genocide that is occurring within our organization in an attempt to steal the plan for the international government, and within the families of the independent members of our organization.

Our plan for the international government must enable every person on the planet to be able to create the life they want--the life that enables them to fulfill their purpose in life. The international government, based on Universal Law, will guarantee their right to do that. Because the requirement to participate is based on the principles of the cooperation of nature, which involves everyone sharing his or her talents and gifts, which everyone is born with to enable us to fulfill our purpose in life, no one can be left out of the global renaissance, even the poorest and smallest and weakest person on the planet.

No one can be left out, because if they are left out, under Universal Law, the person who leaves the other out is left out himself and the person who is left out is brought back into the framework through projects that benefit everyone.

Change only occurs easily at the end or the beginning of a cycle, and so this is a time where they are many changes occurring. Mankind can go up, down or straight ahead. Which will it be? Will the United States defend Saddam Hussein by addressing the legality of the Iraq War, or will we devolve further into a global conflict?

Friday, March 3, 2017

The making of a president

If the existing U.S. presidential election process is collapsing, what will work? During the 2016 election, two people with high disapproval ratings dominated the election, and a wealthy businessman with no prior government experience became president of the United States. People voted for him because they believe he can solve the problems. Americans are dissatisfied with the way our government functions, and are looking for outsiders to solve the problems. 

If the present structure isn't working, what will work? During the era of world peace, what will it take to become president of the United States?

Our organization is working to purify the U.S. legal system so that unfair practices that have caused chaos in our system do not spread the chaos onto the international level. We are working to undo the damage that has been done, and election reform will take priority, including how elections are financed, and the two party system, which denied third party candidates their opportunity to be heard in the debates even if their names were listed on every ballot. 

We are proposing that anyone can become president so long as they can solve the problems, and it won't take a huge campaign chest to be able to afford to win. The process should not be based on donations, but nonprofit organizations, like the League of Women Voters and colleges and universities, can host debates on every level, and the media can publish articles about the candidates and their platforms. Several elections will be held. and the winners will progress to the "finals," the way sports function. The candidates who can offer legitimate plans to solve the problems will be able to move forward.

Our organization has a remarkable series of cards that offer the root cause of the crises mankind is facing. If you know the root cause of a crisis, with the planning process you can solve the problem, so if the candidates use the root cause cards and the planning process to create proposals for communities, the debates can be more like offering the people solutions to their problems. They will sell their proposals to communities to get the support they need rather than their souls to get donations. They will prove their capacity to the electorate.  

The root cause of the crisis mankind is facing is the power games that people and governments play. Our plan for the international government is based on the root cause of the crisis, and the steps and stages of the planning process that carries the solution forward to its conclusion. If you take the U.S. Constitution and the cooperation of nature, two proven concepts and both are in the public domain, and put them into every nation, at the end of 100 years, there would be 200 variations of the plan based on the nation's natural resources, cultures and histories. The same would apply with the plans offered by the candidates.  

We are introducing fifty innovative project ideas, and they demonstrate the principles associated with the plan for world peace and the global renaissance. The project ideas will spin off and anyone can take these ideas and create projects based on their own talents and gifts. 

Our tent tour will enable us to take our project ideas and open them to debate, and help potential presidential candidates prepare for future elections, and they can help us get the plan to reform the election process into Congress. 

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

The Race is On, and It Will Be a Long One

Before we can start to create the plan for the international government, there must be a rationale for it. People must see the need for it to come about. The existing structure must prove to be inadequate. Until then, we must keep introducing the plan and opening it to debate. At this time, the people in power are holding onto the existing structure, and it is impossible to pry their fingers off of it. The idea of revenge and grabbing for power is entrenched in their minds. People must be squeezed to participate, and that occurs when the opportunities end. (We will go into that in greater depth this coming month.)

With the election of Donald Trump, the United States has started into the third cycle of the Light Source Invention. President Trump announced yesterday to Congress his intent to increase military spending, and he proposes to cut spending for programs that benefit the people. He is facing resistance from Democrats, and even some from his own party, but he he has the power of the majority party to force his own agenda. This has the capacity to put the elected officials, who bridge between the government and the people, into a dilemma. He has a solid base of supporters, and so the United States is progressing through the waves of the Light Source Invention, starting with war.

People who are dragged into war lack equality, so any program that President Trump supports that does not treat all people fairly and equally, will take away his support. This is stating the obvious, but the power a nation has is derived from the people, not the governments, so it is also a matter of the people standing up to assume responsibility and demanding from their governments that they stand on the principles of fairness and equality. That is difficult to do when the people are un-empowered.  

The power games governments play are oppressive to the people, so governments that react to protests by denying people a voice are triggering acts of terrorism. Any nation that reaches this point is one step from being a failed state. 

The plan for the international government cannot come from the world leaders, who are not willing to relinquish their power based on power games of one-upmanship. The plan is coming from the people, when the people believe their governments are willing to listen. 

The power is shifting to the people now with the launch of the Constitutional Amendment proposal. Presidents Bush and Obama each had eight years in office, and it takes up to seven years for a constitutional amendment to go through the process, so we will consider this now to be a kind of race to the finish line, and the race will take seven years--the same years Donald Trump may occupy the White House. During that time, our organization must convince all fifty state legislatures to send resolutions to Congress, all with the same wording, and then get all fifty states to ratify the amendment. To get their support, we must be able to solve their problems, and the first two states are Oregon and California. 

Over the next month or so, we will look at all the principles of the U.S. proposal, and then start next month to address the principles of our proposal to Iraq. The other nations can make progress while the United States is working to amend the Constitution.