America can start the world peace process

The United States of America is a melting pot of cultures and religions, and our Constitution has enabled us to live in peace for over 240 years--except for the Civil War, and that was a time when nations were experimenting with new freedoms. Our Constitution guarantees Americans our inalienable rights, as as people came to America for these rights, the first generations formed into culture groups who spoke the same languages, and then their children bridged the old cultures and moved out into the mainstream American culture.

An example of this is bridging is occurring now as the door to Cuba is opening again. Older Cuban Americans are going back to visit their family who stayed in Cuba, but their children are more American than Cuban.

This process has enabled the power game of regime change. The transitional government that was put into power in Iraq came from Detroit and England.

The counterpoint of that, though, is that the loyalties in one individual or one culture group can be flip-flopped. Regime change can topple governments, but when the proverbial pendulum swings to its  extreme, there is also the possibility that these same culture groups can also rise against the United States.

On the west coast of the United States, during World War II, for example, there was the fear that the Japanese Americans would become spies for Japan, so many were placed into concentration camps. There was also an element of Greed associated with this, because some who went into the camps were law-abiding Americans who lived in nice houses and ran lucrative businesses, and they lost what they had to people who preyed on them.

There is no way to defend yourself from prejudice and ulterior motives. It becomes a genocide.

The power games are oppressive to the people. The games must stop.

The blog is based on the premise that the same crises occur on every level, and so if you solve the problem on one level, you can apply the same solution on every level. Our organization is a microcosm of the planet, with our 200 independent members, but the United States of America is also a microcosm of the entire planet, and so it is up to both to demonstrate the solution.

Can we bring world peace within the United States? How can we do that?

Rather than to play the game of regime change--which reached its ultimate conclusion with the preemptive strike on Iraq--can the United States start the world peace process within the United States, and demonstrate the potential to the rest of the world?

This is not isolationism. We are not isolating ourselves from the rest of the planet. We are demonstrating the potential of the U.S. Constitution to enable a nation to live in peace, to bring together the cultures and religions. We don't have to democratize other nations, we can demonstrate the potential of democracy, and take our own nation to a higher level by standing on the principles that made our nation great.

We are dealing with racial problems that other nations don't have. We can learn from other nations.
Each nation has an ancient culture that is homogenous, and they each have a niche concept already, but also must take it to the higher level. They have forgotten their historical and traditional niches, and, just like the United States, have strayed from the principles that have made them great, also.

How we intend to address this within the United States is through our tent tour segment. We must amend our Constitution to create the additional layer of government over what already exists, and our plan is to go into every state and to give its citizens the opportunity to approach their state legislatures to request they create resolutions to give to Congress to bring together a Convention of States.

Just a week ago, an organization drew together delegates from all over the United States in a mock Convention of States to debate possible amendments to our Constitution. While our Founding Fathers used this format for writing the Constitution, since then, it is never been successfully used to amend our Constitution. It has always gone through Congress, but Congress has been unwilling to give any power to the States, and has chosen not to address the State's resolutions. Now, with a 20% approval rating, and the potential for the rise of violent extremism in the United States, it is time for the federal government to agree to support the plan for the international government--by turning inside our country--and to agree that if the States will bring a resolution for the international government to them, that they will agree to this amendment process.

First, we must approach Congress and explain to them how each of their States will benefit by supporting the plan for the international government. When can we do this? We are dealing with a presidential election, but also a Congressional election. The president of the United States does not sign an amendment into law, so as far as world peace is concerned, whether the United States participates in the international government is up to the people. It is up to the people to approach their State legislatures, but first they must be aware of how it will benefit them, also.

Our organization has been enduring a hostile takeover. The pirates have taken the plan an claimed it for their own, but even if a corrupted form of the plan has gone out, many, many people are now aware of the plan. No one will agree to a plan that does not benefit everyone. It is time to find out how the plan will benefit each individual, and how it can enable everyone to function on a higher level.

The conflict in Iraq taught the entire planet many things. The power games don't work. The need for a way to resolve conflicts without going to war. That you cannot get the life you want by grabbing for power.

Is America on the wrong side of history?

I have watched the conflict in Syria. Our organization can offer a different and wider perspective that clears up misunderstandings.

When the plan for the international government was first offered to the core group of our prayer circle, each of us were told we play parallels to people who were part of major historical movements. We are parallels to existing world leaders and aspects of past kings, queens and presidents, and other famous people from the past. Before we were born, we watched to see how they functioned, and then we were born into this cycle of historical events, and it is now our turn to play out the same events.

Cycles don't replay the events exactly the same. Each cycle spirals up a bit, so the crises are not quite so difficult. What makes this time period unusual is that all the cycles have lined up, and we are playing out several roles, and because change only occurs easily at the beginning and the end of a cycle, this has been a time of great changes. Many people are resisting the evolutionary changes.

The man who is parallel to Bashar al-Assad of Syria is an aspect George Washington, who is known as he Father of the United States of America.

George Washington fought in the French and Indian War.  He was a colonial delegate from Virginia to the conventions of the founding fathers, and while he said little during the debates, he saw before the others that war was inevitable, that a diplomatic solution was not possible, and so when the founding fathers agreed to go to war, he was the logical person to take command of the revolutionary army.

The man who is parallel to George W. Bush is an aspect of Thomas Jefferson. George W. Bush's preemptive strike on Iraq--(the person who is parallel to Saddam Hussein is an aspect of  John Adams) is a reflection of the relationship between two men who had a close relationship, but also very antagonistic.

The act of revenge against Saddam Hussein created a schism within the U.S. government, between the Republicans and the Democrats. The Republicans for many years have equated patriotism with waging war.  Does George W. Bush play the same role in history that King George III play in England?

The question now becomes, does fighting Bashar al Assad place the United States on the wrong side of history?

Many paths to the same destination

Our destination is the conference of world leaders in Europe. Our organization will host the conference once the U.S. legal system has been purified to prevent the chaos in our legal system from spreading onto the international level. We know where we want to go, but we must know where we are and the steps to get there.

Each proposal offers a different path to the conference. The Track Our Progress planning for each of the proposals is a map to the conference, and the Exit Strategy for Iraq is the first path that one family and one nation--Iraq--will take. The contingency for the Exit Strategy is the U.S. Constitutional Amendment proposal to the United States. Both are actually U.S. proposals, and it is as if the United States is coming to the understanding that existing policies for ending crises in the world won't work, and so a new plan must be addressed. If everything you do just makes the crisis worse, it is time to turn it over to someone who can solve the problem and is already solving the problem. This will occur for every proposal.

The conflict in Iraq devolved as a global genocide, and ripples of effects have gone out from the Grand Lie to draw in every person on the planet. Our organization started with a prayer circle, and each week we met to pray for people in crisis and for the planet, including the conflict in Iraq. We proved our intent, and we got answers to our prayers, but God, the Creator of us all, did not miraculously solve the problems for us, they explained to us how to solve problems and then empowered us to take the steps in our own lives. Karen Holmes, a channel--a prophet--channeled a series of books and booklets that are "channeled messages from God on how to overcome any crisis."

People must be squeezed to participate in the framework based on the cooperation of nature. The global conflict is leaving many people in crisis, but the books enable people to understand how to overcome their crises and to walk forward to create the life they want.

The idea is that people must come up with a plan that benefits everyone, and their plan must address the root cause of the crisis. At this point, people generally go to someone to help them, but the question is who? Lady Gaia is the female aspect of God, and she is willing to help us to solve problems by giving us the root cause of the crises we are facing, and Seth, one of our guides, teaches the planning process.

If you know the root cause of a crisis, with the planning process, you can find the solution.

God also gives us our talents and gifts, which enable us to fulfill our purposes in life.

The second path, then, is to work with Light-bearers who can channel God, and because everyone is in crisis, the overview crisis center is the place to start--based on the plan for the international government. It is up to God who they work with.

These are the first stages in our planning, and they allow us to bring in the project teams, and that allows us to bring in the people.

The United States and Iraq will be on the path to the conference to Europe as both nations work through the planning stages and steps of their proposals.

Three fingers are pointing back at you

Warning: this post may make you angry.

There is a spiritual concept--One Mind. It says that what you see in someone else is what is inside of you. I have talked about how to stop ISIS, and many others believe that the solution to stopping ISIS is to degrade and destroy, but today, let's say that if we point our finger at others, three fingers are pointing back at us. Change must first start with us.

ISIS is made up of genocidaires, people who were dragged into conflict when the Grand Lie was told, but ISIS is actually no different than the American and British troops who fought in Iraq. They believed the lies, too, that justified the preemptive strike, that Saddam Hussein had WMD and the intent to use them at any time against the United States.

ISIS is considered an illegal conflict, but so is the conflict in Iraq.

The preemptive strike went against the intent of the U.N. Charter to prevent unprovoked attacks. It went against the premise that someone is presumed innocent until proven guilty, one of the principles of the U.S. legal system, because you cannot defend yourself against prejudice and ulterior motives. It breaks the Commandment that "thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor," because it is a form of character defamation. You cannot defend yourself from prejudice and ulterior motives.

At the same time, to twist that around to say that you can to use prejudice and ulterior motives against your enemy with impunity means that you are going against Universal Law, and you are fighting the Universe and you can't win. The power games go on until an innocent person is crucified.

The games are bad, not the people. If this post makes you angry, it is time to look at the principles in depth, because by declaring you have to right to judge another means that you will be judged.

Saddam Hussein has been dead a long time, but the conflict in Iraq still rages on. All the nations that are part of our first year's proposals fell into crisis due to a sense of judgment.

The first row of the World Peace Marketing Strategy is for those who stand on the principles, such as a husband who has been accused of infidelity standing on the principles that he was working late. The second row is for the wife who fears for her security and support. The first row teaches the principles to the second row, that if you are responsible for your own security and support there is no need to fear the loss, and the second row is the watchdog to make sure the husband is actually doing what he says he is doing--working late. By dragging the children into the conflict, she undermines the family, and by running to the neighbors with her fears, she is undermining the simple solution and bringing in people who may attempt to undermine the entire family. The same crises occur on every level.

Saddam Hussein stood on the principles that Kuwait did not have the right to slant drill into his oil fields, but George H.W. Bush's security and support was threatened, and he supported Kuwait in the Gulf War.

Saddam Hussein protested that the U.N. sanctions had killed 500,000 Iraqi children, and that threatened the security and support of Bill Clinton, and Madelaine Albright, Secretary of State under President Clinton, stated in an televised interview when asked about the Iraqi children that yes, their foreign policy against Saddam Hussein was justified. (She later changed her mind.)

Saddam Hussein complied with U.N. sanctions and destroyed his WMD programs, but George W. Bush went ahead with the preemptive strike anyway, ignoring the advice of Hans Blix, U.N. weapons inspector.

The Iraq Inquiry--the Chilcot Report--is out and Tony Blair is facing severe scrutiny, but no one, including the media, Barack Obama and the rest of America--George Bush remains quiet-- is willing to assume responsibility for our own share in the conflict.

Donald Trump and Rudy Giuliani have declared in the news this last week that we should have taken Iraq's oil fields as spoils of war, without addressing the fact that it was an illegal war and therefore, we should be paying them. He doesn't say how he intends to get control of them.

Obviously, it is time to address what the principles are.

Let's start with Universal Law of Cause and Effect, to which everyone on the planet has been exposed. It is called by many names, but is means "what you do to another will be done to you." You can use it as a tool or a punishment. To get the life you want, you must enable others to get their life, but at the same time, if you leave someone out, you will be left out. The solution to every dilemma is to do what is in everyone's best interest.  You cannot get your life by leaving out Saddam Hussein or ISIS. Doing what is in everyone's best interest is not the same thing as saying, "the world is better off without Saddam Hussein" or "we must create a coalition to degrade and destroy ISIS." That is what George Bush said about Saddam Hussein and Iraq.

The one thing that everyone on the planet wants is to be able to create his or her life without interference. This is one of our inalienable rights granted to us by our Creator. To deny another individual his or her rights, you lose your own.

By denying the Iraqi people their rights, America is in the process of losing ours. To get them back again, we must enable all the people on the planet to have the same rights we have under our Constitution. The plan for the international government, which will guarantee to every person on the planet our inalienable rights is the solution to ISIS.

There is a solution to the rise of ISIS

Yesterday marked the 15th anniversary of 9/11, the worst terrorist attack on the planet, and I am sure that fifteen years ago today, the big question on the minds of the U.S. government was on how to stop the terrorists.

Mankind always has three choices, but in times of crisis, only two are tenable. One was to ignore the crisis and continue to be backed into the proverbial corner, the other to build a coalition of nations to fight violent extremism and to fight militarily, but neither addresses the root cause of terrorism, which is that people on the bottom have no voice in matters of grave concern, and they must raise their voice to be heard, oftentimes to the point of violence. The solution go up and to end al Qaeda was not to degrade and destroy, but to open a dialogue and to address their grievances.

Fifteen years ago, the plan for the international government was not yet an option, and the choice was for a War on Terror. The preemptive strike on Iraq was an act of revenge, which drew together world leaders who play five favorite power games, so rather than to end the games, the games have proliferated. Forming the coalition to degraded and destroy al Qaeda seemed to work, but it set the stage for ISIS.

ISIS is based on the power game of Lust, which creates a sense of illusion that enslaves people. I am not just talking about the victims of ISIS, but ISIS itself, which is made up of people who have been dragged into the genocide and now have no way out of their crisis. They have been enslaved. People who are enslaved lack compassion. To end slavery, they need a place to go. The refugees may function on a higher level than ISIS does, because at least they may be tolerated in other nations.

Our organization is going through the same crisis. Many young men and women have been enslaved, like gang members, and were expected to perpetrate criminal acts or framed for acts and did so out of fear for their own lives, and now they are being charged with crimes. Older people who should know better were approached and offered what appeared to be a legitimate business proposition, but it was a trap. Many people are now profoundly mentally ill. It has created a huge quagmire, with no apparent solution.

But, there is a solution, and it is the plan for the international government--and on a parallel basis, our organization.

ISIS is sponsored by one individual who wants to become the emperor of the planet. That individual is parallel to a nation, so ISIS can be considered a state-sponsored organization, but he or she hides behind the illusion. This person has woven the illusion with the idea of outsmarting others, but it is like a sleight of hand sense of illusion, and when discovered, he or she is like a weasel, and twists and turns so you can't grab hold. The idea is to delay the inevitable creation of the international government. Fear and darkness are spreading across the face of the planet.

The solution is not to fight, because you are always in a reactive mode and because of the lines of defense by the slaves and the innocent people who have been dragged into the conflict. It is difficult to determine who is telling the truth, and the truth does not overcome the lie. It has reached the point where no one knows who to trust.

"Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive!"

ISIS seems unstoppable, but the solution is the plan for the international government, and to start to defend oneself from ISIS by understanding that no one can prevent you from getting the life you want--but your life is not based on something that you have been offered, but to fulfill your purpose in life. This is one of the inalienable rights granted to each of us on the planet, the right to create our life without interference, and therefore anyone who attempts to steal it from us is fighting the Universe and cannot win.

The power games don't work, and there is always a backlash to the games because they go against Universal Law. It is in no one's best interest for one individual to become emperor of the planet, and there is always a backlash to the games. The backlash to enslaving people is that you, yourself, will be enslaved.

Everyone was born into a country, so in a way, everyone must be counted as a citizen of their home nation. The invitations to participate in the international government requires people to address conflict resolution within their nation. A majority of the people on the planet has prayed for peace and so it can come. People know oppression when we see it. The power games are no longer being tolerated.

The governments of many nations have been undermined as part of the hostile takeover of the planet, and a schism has formed between factions. One faction is standing on the principles and the other has gone down into the power games. Like a hostile divorce, the people of the nation are caught without a foundation to be able to get their life, and other nations are coming in to interfere. This is called "Armageddon," which means "the silly things people do." People are doing illogical things to prevent everyone from working together to create the international government--to postpone its creation, like a delaying tactic. There are a series of battles, and the last one is when one walks away and the other is forced to find a teacher, and that involves joining the plan for the international government, also.

This is occurring all over the planet now.

The first step, then, is not to fight ISIS, but to end the global genocide by addressing the fact that Saddam Hussein was innocent of the charges, that there were no WMD. The United States must assume responsibility for our role in the conflict in Iraq, and the acts of revenge that followed. By participating in the Exit Strategy for Iraq, where disputes between nations are resolved in court, the United States is agreeing to a plan that benefits everyone.

The legal system of the international government will be based on Universal Law, to which everyone on the planet has been exposed. You can't get your life by breaking Universal Law.

The Light must start to come back into the world, and that is the understanding that there is a solution, and therefore, there is hope for the future. Everyone must understand the root cause of the crisis, how we got into the crisis, where we are now, where we are going and how to get there. The root cause is the act of revenge against Saddam Hussein, and by understanding how revenge works and why it doesn't work, and how the Battles of Armageddon function, the Light can grow again and peace can come.

Step by step, the proposals unravel the illusion that has been woven.

Who has what you want?

Our organization is enduring a hostile takeover in the form of a character defamation campaign. The entire planet is facing a hostile takeover in the form of the rise of the caliphate or anyone who is attempting to rise to the role of emperor by playing favorite power games. Two power games are based on weaving an illusion--genocide and slavery.

It is very difficult to overcome the illusion. You must understand how the games work, and why they don't work.

There has been a fear that the creation of an international government will lead to the enslavement of the people, and now mankind is facing that fear, because what you fear, you bring toward you. There is a legitimate plan that benefits everyone, and one that enslaves the people, so how can you tell which is which?

This is a time of profound darkness. Then, as in the times of darkness, God, the Creator of us all, hears our prayers and sends a Son--someone who will lead us out of the crisis. The Bible warns the end times are a time when false prophets will become a threat. There are people who want to drag others deeper into the abyss. The question is "who has what you want?"

In the Illusion, we are 180 degrees from where we think we are. We are lost and headed the wrong direction. Until we reach the understanding that we are lost, no one can convince us that we are headed the wrong direction.

The idea behind the question is are you depending on someone or something that cannot help you get the life you want? For some people, relying on the person who is dragging you into the abyss is the answer to the way out of the crisis.

The question then is "what do you want?" If you want revenge, that is all you will get.

You can't get the life you want by getting revenge. 

The first step for the first proposal is to bring in the professional publishing team. Everyone on the team has a history related to spiritual teachings, and now they are being given the opportunity to function on a higher level. They must apply in their own lives what they have learned and taught to others. To this point, spiritual books have focused on that you create your own reality, now the message is how to create your own reality. This takes the spiritual movement to the entire planet, but also the entire planet has something to teach the spiritual teachers because everyone has already been working to create the life they want, but getting kicked off course by playing the power games.

What has what you want? The existing structure? Someone who wants to drag you into acts of revenge? Someone who is standing in the Light and applying the teachings in his or her own life?